Showing posts with label photosharing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label photosharing. Show all posts

Monday, August 20, 2007

Face it, Facebook is hot

19 Aug 2007, ST

Roll over, Friendster. Social networking site Facebook is now the in way to connect

By Hong Xinyi

THEATRE director Alvin Tan has swopped one addiction for another.

The artistic director of The Necessary Stage (TNS) recently kicked his smoking habit. Nowadays, instead of taking a cigarette break, he checks his Facebook page instead.

'I like to try these things,' says Tan, 44, a former user of social networking sites Friendster, Multiply and MySpace. These accounts, already scarred by onslaughts of spam, now lie abandoned as he embraces his latest obssession, Facebook.

He signed up a month ago and checks his Facebook page every day, often putting up information about TNS projects.

'I'm kind of addicted,' he says, half-sheepishly and half-jokingly. He's even in a Facebook group for fellow addicts called I Am A Facebook Whore.

Why the Facebook fervour? The clean design and user-friendly applications are very inviting, he says. He also uses FaceBook for research by checking out e-groups like Singaporeans Are Just Way Cooler.

'It's a fast way of knowing what people are talking about. You can spar with different ideas, it's quite a stimulating environment. In many ways, it's a weird cyber-community whose bonds are stronger than superglue even though you may not necessarily see these people you interact with.'

Indeed, the easy-to-use range of third-party applications and variety of groups on FaceBook not only mimics the minutiae of real life but in many ways also creates a virtual universe that allows for fun and convenient ways of interaction.

Besides keeping in touch with friends through conventional messages, there is a whole range of more informal behaviour at your disposal, like saying hello by giving someone a naughty (virtual) poke or sending a stressed friend a cold beer (icon).

Naomi Minejima, 31, a casting director, joined FaceBook at the urging of her husband. 'In one day, I was hooked,' she says. Favourite functions include 'fluffy things' like sending high-fives and flying kicks to friends.

Sheryl Lee, 18, a law student at Singapore Management University, checks in at her FaceBook account every day, and likes applications like Fortune Cookie (get a new fortune whenever you want), sending her friends Mardi Gras beads and starting a virtual food fight.

In her view, Facebook is the best social networking site of the moment because it's more sophisticated than Friendster and less of a poseur than MySpace.

'Friendster seems over-used, I'm bored of it. And I feel a sort of revulsion towards MySpace, it has too many notorious profiles of instant celebreties like Paris Hilton.'

A tool to stay in touch

FACEBOOK'S image of understated cool has been carefully nurtured. Launched in 2004 by Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg, it originated as a networking tool for Harvard students. Last year, access was expanded to all members of the public.

In a Newsweek article, technology journalist Steven Levy noted that 'unlike services like the giant MySpace... Facebook is not a place where emerging stand-up comics, hip indie bands and soft-porn starlets try to break out by tagging thousands of people as virtual friends... The Facebook experience is built around people you know.'

Singaporean Kelly Lai, 20, is currently a student at Britain's Cambridge University. 'Everyone I know gets a Facebook account when they start university. It's a way to keep in touch with people who may be in different countries.

'It's also a good way of staying in contact with new people you meet and don't want to exchange phone numbers with yet. I've got to know people better through Facebook.'

Ms Aparna Aiyar, 20, a Singaporean student at the University of Chicago, made use of FaceBook to get to know people at her current school before she set off for the United States. 'I use it a lot now to see what my friends are doing during their summer vacation.'

The company's website states that there are more than 31 million active users and a July Time magazine article reports that 'with more than 150,000 new users signing up daily, it is growing three times as fast as rival MySpace'.

The majority of users are in the US, with Canada and Britain ranking second and third respectively. In the US, a large proportion of its users are college students in their late teens and early 20s. There are 23,365 Facebook users registered in Singapore.

For nightlife entrepreneur Michel Lu, 36, Facebook is a way to connect with friends, indulge in his interests and publicise his clubs Hacienda and SuperFamous and an upcoming restaurant.

'Friendster is a mess nowadays and MySpace looks very cluttered,' says Mr Lu, who has been a Facebook user for five months and checks his account every day.

He is the proud member of the Cupcake Appreciation group, as well as several local music groups.

'It's pretty amazing. I just added a girl I met in London 10 years ago and haven't seen since. It's wonderful to be able to stay connected to old friends.'

---------------------------------

Which site is the coolest?

HERE'S how the top three social networking sites stack up against one another.

Friendster

Founded in 2002 by American computer programmer Jonathan Abrams, then 32. It accumulated three million users within months of its launch, but teething problems and corporate reshuffles have since weakened its early lead.

It is still widely used today, with a reported 47 million accounts. The key difference is that it's no longer the only game in town and far from the coolest.

MySpace

Founded in 2003 by American Internet company eUniverse (changed to Intermix in 2004), MySpace quickly overtook Friendster as the most popular social networking site.

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation bought the site in 2005 for US$580 million.

Today, it reportedly boasts more than 100 million accounts. Bands like the Arctic Monkeys have reaped the rewards of the publicity they got through MySpace pages.

Facebook

Founded in 2004 by Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg, now 23.

With more than 31 million active users, Facebook differentiates itself with features like an eBay-like marketplace and a wide variety of third-party applications.

It is also the site that is most popular with American college students. In a 2006 study, Facebook was named the second most popular thing among undergraduates after the iPod, sharing equal importance with beer and sex.


Sunday, August 5, 2007

Yahoo to close its free photo-sharing site

By Katherine Boehret

The Wall Street Journal

02 Aug, 2007

Yahoo's recent announcement that it would be closing its Yahoo Photos division on Sept. 20 forced its users to decide what to do with their photos.

The site's photo-storage and sharing service, which has been around for about seven years, is bowing to its hipper counterpart, Flickr.com, also owned by Yahoo Inc.

When faced with the daunting task of transferring entire collections of uploaded photos to a new Web site, or just choosing a site on which to start sharing digital photos, consumers are worried about choosing the wrong one.

This week, I compared data about five popular photo-sharing sites: Kodak Gallery, Shutterfly, Snapfish, Flickr and Photobucket. Many other sites offer to do the job, such as SmugMug and Webshots, but I stuck to the five major sites suggested by Yahoo as alternatives to its photo service.

I had accounts on all but one of these free sites, and easily signed up for the fifth. In addition to using the sites, I quizzed each company on its offerings, asking about privacy, community sharing, editing, storage restrictions, what happens to dormant accounts, creating photo projects like books and uploading images via email or cellphone.

The features offered by each company are overwhelming - and easy to confuse. Two of the five sites, Kodak Gallery and Snapfish, require a purchase at least once a year or your photos will be deleted (after warning emails). Each site offers free accounts and all except Shutterfly will upgrade your account for $25 a year. Photobucket and Flickr excel in creating communities for continuous sharing, while Kodak Gallery, Snapfish and Shutterfly focus on acting as repositories for uploaded images, one event at a time. The sharing sites have storage limitations, while the others don't.

Below, I've outlined some pros and cons for each service, while remarking briefly on a site's overall feel and usability. See the accompanying chart for more details.

Kodak Gallery
(www.kodakgallery.com)

This is a solid site for sharing albums with friends in a few straightforward steps. Though its options for editing photos tend to feel a bit clumsy, they're probably the best out of the five sites. Most sites expect users to edit images before sharing them. Earlier this year, Kodak introduced a new version of its EasyShare desktop software program with richer editing features, such as images that expand to almost the entire screen.

In addition to its $25 a year Gallery Premier account, you can opt to pay twice as much for the account and a discount on Kodak prints - 10 cents each rather than 15 cents. Paid accounts let you download high-resolution versions of each photo and give you a unique Web address for sharing photos that can be password protected. But the other four sites offer personal Web sites as free features, rather than just with paid accounts.

Shutterfly
(www.shutterfly.com)

Shutterfly seemed to be the simplest site, though it isn't the most attractive or user friendly. All of its features are free. Shutterfly does away with two conditions that Kodak Gallery and Snapfish have: It doesn't require any purchases in order to keep your account from being deleted nor does it ever require your friends to sign in before viewing a shared album.

But Shutterfly's simplicity can also be a hindrance. It doesn't let you upload videos to share, nor can you download high-resolution versions of each photo or send photos to the site via email or mobile device; the other sites do these things either for free or with a paid account.

Snapfish
(www.snapfish.com)

Snapfish is Hewlett-Packard Co.'s photo-sharing site, and it stands out because it has the most restrictions. Along with its requirement that you purchase something at least once a year to keep your account, guests who view your albums must always sign in; you can't change this setting like on the other sites. To skirt this issue, Snapfish emphasizes its Group Rooms, or personalized sharing Web sites that users view with a specific URL and a password (if you choose to have one).

Snapfish and Shutterfly both have Web sites on which photos appear too small for my taste, though Snapfish does offer generously sized images in photo slideshows - a plus. I'd prefer the site itself showed larger images in other instances. High-resolution version of photos can be downloaded for a fee of 25 cents for one and five cents for more than one.

Flickr
(www.flickr.com)

Photobucket.com
(www.photobucket.com)

Of the two community sharing sites, I preferred Flickr over Photobucket. The site felt cleaner, with fewer distractions and one less advertisement than Photobucket. For people who aren't used to these more progressive sites, Photobucket and Flickr may seem extreme. They offer things like tagging and use terms that can be confusing. Flickr uses "sets" in place of "albums," and photos are organized within "batches." Photobucket organizes albums, but then lets you create sub albums within an album.

Neither site requires annual purchases, and both allow free high-resolution downloads of photos. Instead of one-time sharing, the sites use photostreams, or constantly updated photo blogs that friends can check.

Flickr and Photobucket make it easy to post photos to blogs in one step, including Blogger and Typepad. Photobucket also lets you post to MySpace and Facebook in one step.

In Flickr, you can meet people who have interests similar to yours by searching through Groups. I joined a group that shared photos of tennis courts around the world. Digital photos suddenly offered ways to socialize online without chatting or leaving overused messages for strangers.

Among other things, Photobucket lets you create a Remix - a presentation made of your photos and/or videos after they're dragged into a storyline and mixed in with music, transitions and graphics. The result was entertaining and professional, though it took just seconds to make.

Ideally, I'd like to combine a favorite feature from each of these sites to make one great photo-sharing Web site. I found something wrong with each one, but Kodak Gallery and its EasyShare software program offer a good combination of editing and sharing. Flickr was my preferred community photo site, though it and Photobucket both offer fresh ways to share digital photos.


Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Snapfish aims to reel in online photo shop rivals here

31 Jul 2007, ST

Global leader offers 19-cent 4R prints, unlimited uploads and storage as bait

By Oo Gin Lee

SNAPFISH, the world's No. 1 online photo service by number of customers, is now in Singapore waters.

Its home is www.snap fish.com.sg, where customers can upload, store and display an unlimited number of digital pictures and order prints.

Snapfish's lure? The 4R prints come at 19 cents each.

Photo prints in 4R size cost between 20 and 50 cents each at retail and online photo print shops - and print quality can vary.

Mr Bala Parthasarathy, Snapfish's founder and now vice-president of online imaging at Hewlett-Packard (HP) Asia-Pacific, said: 'We are focused on delivering what consumers want and at 19 cents, we are lower than any retail or online provider in Singapore. The prints are of high quality.'

Spawned in the United States in 2000, Snapfish was acquired by HP in 2005.

It has more than 40 million customers in 15 countries. They can upload their photographs at any time by connecting their cameras to a computer or using Bluetooth from their camera phones.

The website imposes only one condition on its customers who want to keep their prints online - that they order at least one photo every year.

Prints are mailed direct to them.

Online photo services have been in Singapore since 2000 but snapfish.com.sg is the first service that offers unlimited uploads and storage.

To reel in users, it offers 20 free 4R prints for first-time customers, but will bill them for the $1.90 mailing cost.

FotoHub, a similar online photo service, also lets its users upload their digital photos 24/7, but only up to 200MB worth of data. It is revamping its website and will up the limit to 1GB later this year.

Customers who order prints get a choice of having the photos mailed to them or to a retail service provider, where they can be picked up.

FotoHub, at www.foto hub.com, charges 45 cents for each 4R print, but gives discounts of 30 per cent for orders placed between midnight and 6am.

The chief executive of its consumer division, Mr Eric Tan, welcomed Snapfish's entry into the market.

'This is a good thing. Snapfish's entry will help raise greater awareness about online photo printing for the industry as a whole.'

Snapfish's launch here is part of its push into the Asia-Pacific region. It was launched in Australia last December, and India is next.

Regular online photo user and freelance writer Yong Ai Lei, 37, said: 'Snapfish's unlimited storage is very attractive as it will let me easily share my photos with friends overseas. But the most important thing for me is that the print quality must be good.'


Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Flickr Photos


Recently, i was sourcing for a photo sharing site and finally decided to settle for Flickr. Flickr is owned by Yahoo. Yahoo's existing Photos site would be shut down by September 2007. And any existing photo account, if not transferred to other photo sharing sites like Photo bucket etc, by then would be deleted.

I did have an Yahoo Photo account and found it to be extremely useful. However, as it was in the midst of being phased out, i got no choice but to use another photo site.

Frankly, it was not easy to look for a reliable photo sharing site. My requirements was that they should allow photos of a decent size (above 1 mega pixel each) , have enough mega memory storage space and can be accessed via albums.

I have fallen prey to 2 other photo sharing sites. One is esnips, which i sometimes could not access after a few months. Another is YouRep, a beta site and also one of Time magazine Top 10 websites of 2006. YouRep has totally disappeared! Who knows what happen? Maybe they ran out of funding or their organisation collapsed or whatever?

I do like Photo Bucket, but photo bucket is more for sharing photos. It is usefully if one intend to view the photos one by one. But then if one desire to view photos album by album, then Photo Bucket is not that suitable.

Another site I had used is Picasa Photos by Google. However, Picasa free account only has 1024 Mb memory space. Their pro account for US$25 annually comes with only 7Gb of memory space. So currently, yeah, i am using Picasa as a sort of backup photo site.

Anyway, i was happily uploading my pics to Flickr when i came across their first limitation, which i was unaware when i sighed up. That is, for a free account, i can only create up to 3 sets of batches. 1 batch set of photos is like a set of photo album. Without the ability to create more than 3 sets to organise the photos, all the photos would be lumped together into one main gallery.

And then i came across the 2nd limitation! That is Flickr would only show up to 200 recent photos uploaded. Any photos beyond 200 would be hidden from view until the account is upgraded to that of a pro account. (see message from Flickr below)

With a free account, I was to be able to upload up to 100Mb worth of photos each calendar month. But then this 100 Mb is bandwidth, not the amount of storage space on Flickr servers. So far, i have just exceeded 200 photos and 60% of my monthly quota!

Bumper! Well, frankly, i did not read any of these limitations when i signed up, especially the only 200 photos shown part. Maybe I had inadvertently skipped that section, or that i had missed the small fine print. If i had known, i would probably try to look for a better photo sharing site.

Hey, I am not a cheap skate. US$24.95 seems a good deal for unlimited storage, unlimited size and unlimited sets. That work out to be about US$2 per month. But the thing here is I am slightly pissed off about the 200 photos part.

Another option i could take is that i could always sign up for another Flickr free account. That means another 200 photos online storage. But I have thousands and thousands of photos! How many free accounts can i sign up?

Sigh!

I have recently organised my photos and wanted to put them online. So i suppose i should sign up for their pro account. But frankly, to me, this felt like something of a threat? I felt it's like Flickr held part of my photos hostage until i sign up for a pro account.

The threat part comes from the wording "come back unharmed". If this is someone sense of perverted humor, frankly, i dun find it that funny.

Come on! In this time and age, 200 photos for a free account is too damn low! I took more than 300 photos at one setting!

Well, nothing is for free. Some things are free up to a certain limit...and then they start charging! Bandwidth is not free, so is storage space and manpower!

But damn, some how, i felt that i have been screwed over!

---------------------------

Hey i wicked! About your photos...

You've run into one of the limits of a free account. Your free account will only display the most recent 200 photos you've uploaded. All of your photos beyond 200 will remain hidden from view until you either delete newer photos, or upgrade to a Pro account.

None of your photos have been deleted, and if you upgrade, they'll all come back unharmed.



Wednesday, July 4, 2007

YouREP is gone!

A few month ago, i came across the website of YouREP, a photo-sharing site, which was in its beta testing phase.

A few days ago, i tried to access the website but failed. So much for beta site!

Screw you, YouREP!

I will never trust another beta site again!

And to think that Time magazine rate it one of the Top 10 websites in 2006!


Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Photo Sharing Sites

The other day i discovered this new photo sharing site, YouREP with 2Gb memory space.

YouREP stands for You Represent. Anyway, it is still in beta stage. And I am wary of these beta sites.

I am still testing YouREP. So far so good. They do allow photos of quite sizable portions.

----------------------------------

The other time, i used another photo sharing site, Esnips also in beta stage. And after not logging in for few weeks, I found out that I just could not logged in anymore! And even after i clicked on the "Forgot Password" column, and changing my password, i still cannot get into my folders! Damn! All those photos and videos are lost somewhere!

The site do offer an attractive 5 Gb memory. But TRY AT OWN YOUR RISKS! Dun say you have not been warned!

Below is the email response they sent me after i emailed them my problem.

---------------------------------

Dear user,

Did you use the virification email to activate your account?

First of all let's make sure you haven't gotten the confirmation e-mail: Please go to the junk mail folder in your e-mail account and look for the confirmation e-mail there (your anti-spam software might have sent it directly to your 'junk mail' folder).

If the e-mail is nowhere to be found, try signing in to your eSnips account again, to prompt resending the confirmation e-mail.

If you don't receive it the second time (don't forget to check the junk mail folder), and have another e-mail account, I recommend that you open a new account with the other e-mail address.

(Preferably not a hotmail or your internet provider e-mail account).

Kind regards,
Meital Bichler
Technical Support

----------------------------------

What do they mean by open a new account? What about my old account? When a site loses the content of their users, they lose their credibility! And if it can happen once, it can definitely happen again!

And do they think I am some sort of retarded idiot? Of course, i read the verification email they sent me, clicked on it and changed my password! But the problem is that I still cannot logged in after that! All it appeared on screen is a blank page!

And they even spelled "verification" wrong! Where is this site operating from?

---------------------------------

Update: Jul 2007

I have tried accessing the website of YouREP for quite a few days now. I think the website is GONE! So much for beta site!

Screw you, You REP!

I will never trust another beta site again!